Post by title1parent on Aug 4, 2009 5:28:56 GMT -5
www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/1699344,2_1_AU04_MAGNET_S1-090804.article
Magnet Academy fate still undecided
August 4, 2009
By ERIKA WURST ewurst@scn1.com
AURORA -- With Power Point presentation in hand, Magnet Academy administrators, parents and advocates were ready for a fight Monday evening as the East Aurora School Board debated whether to keep the program alive.
That decision will have to wait.
After weeks of discussion about the academy's success since its inception, several board members discussed the option of shutting down the program, with its 150 registered students, just weeks before classes are scheduled to start.
After two hours of heated debate, the jury remained hung, and the board voted unanimously to continue discussion on the topic.
Concerned parents and students packed the hot board room at the School Service Center on Fifth Street, where chairs normally sit vacant. On this Monday, however, people flooded out into the halls -- questioning how the district could make such a decision, calling the proposal to close the academy a "slap in the face".
East Aurora third-grade teacher Scott Strand called the idea of closure "an uninspired half-effort" by the district.
"If we close the academy now, we will look erratic and not functioning," he said. A year is not enough time to conclude the success of the program, he said.
"If you have problems with staff and responsiveness, take it to people who are causing the problems and not the kids," one father said.
Nearly every speaker agreed. They talked about the way their children "blossomed" with the new curriculum.
"Talk to these students, and these families," district social worker Lori Rueffer told the board.
"Please stand," she asked, and they did -- the whole room.
"Witness their involvement. It is within our power to help these students of magnet academy caliber to achieve their true potential."
Parents talked of their children crying. Mothers left the room in tears.
"I believe in this district," Strand said, and in the program.
"Give changes a chance," he pleaded. "If we pull the plug now, we won't find out if it work here."
Magnet Academy advocates outlined the need for gifted programs in the district, and pointed to the elimination of "gifted funds" as having greatly impacted the academic success of talented students in East Aurora. The academy, they said, gives parents of children looking for a more rigorous workload a choice when choice is not an option.
Trends show that parents usually leave the district after the fifth and eighth grades. The academy keeps families who would otherwise leave in the district. Advocates said it is too early to compare grades of students who entered the academy to their previous marks, because the academy coursework is more rigorous.
Data show that there is already a significant difference in scores of magnet academy students when compared to other students based on Think Link assessments. Magnet Academy students scored higher in nearly every category.
ISAT scores proved the same. Magnet academy students' scores blew away those of all other district students -- with 100 percent of academy fifth- and eighth-grade students meeting or exceeding state requirements. Barely 70 percent of non-academy students could say the same.
"Nine months is not enough time to provide data to determine if program is or is not working," board member Juanita Wells said to audience applause.
"We as a board need to put aside personal agendas to work with administrators on behalf of our district, in order to make sound judgment and ask for support. We must be provided with information about success of program the program, and nine months is not enough time. It's going to take three to five years to gather sufficient data."
Rayanne Carlson gave an opposing opinion, and stated that students should be offered the same opportunity in all of the schools. She said the board must balance matters of the heart against budget matters, and the district simply cannot afford to keep the academy open.
"I believe in this program fiercely," Stella Gonzalez said. "I think we should coin a phrase. 'One year is not enough.' Research shows one year is not enough to see pros or cons of any program. ... I understand it is a lot of money, but I believe in enhancing, moving forward. This is my profession, kids are my love. We have just let things fall, and we have to give them a push. I hope we can keep you with the magnet schools."
"We have to be the people who make tough decisions and deal with consequences of those decisions," board president Dee Weaver said.
"The mission of the School Board is to educate students and provide them with the best education that you can get. If you get rid of this program, you're not doing that," Bob Coppenhoefer said.
"Parents should be informed of your intent to close the program and the reason for it. I heard all about intent, but haven't heard your reasons. Nobody seems to know why this is being done."
comment at beaconnewsonline.com
Magnet Academy fate still undecided
August 4, 2009
By ERIKA WURST ewurst@scn1.com
AURORA -- With Power Point presentation in hand, Magnet Academy administrators, parents and advocates were ready for a fight Monday evening as the East Aurora School Board debated whether to keep the program alive.
That decision will have to wait.
After weeks of discussion about the academy's success since its inception, several board members discussed the option of shutting down the program, with its 150 registered students, just weeks before classes are scheduled to start.
After two hours of heated debate, the jury remained hung, and the board voted unanimously to continue discussion on the topic.
Concerned parents and students packed the hot board room at the School Service Center on Fifth Street, where chairs normally sit vacant. On this Monday, however, people flooded out into the halls -- questioning how the district could make such a decision, calling the proposal to close the academy a "slap in the face".
East Aurora third-grade teacher Scott Strand called the idea of closure "an uninspired half-effort" by the district.
"If we close the academy now, we will look erratic and not functioning," he said. A year is not enough time to conclude the success of the program, he said.
"If you have problems with staff and responsiveness, take it to people who are causing the problems and not the kids," one father said.
Nearly every speaker agreed. They talked about the way their children "blossomed" with the new curriculum.
"Talk to these students, and these families," district social worker Lori Rueffer told the board.
"Please stand," she asked, and they did -- the whole room.
"Witness their involvement. It is within our power to help these students of magnet academy caliber to achieve their true potential."
Parents talked of their children crying. Mothers left the room in tears.
"I believe in this district," Strand said, and in the program.
"Give changes a chance," he pleaded. "If we pull the plug now, we won't find out if it work here."
Magnet Academy advocates outlined the need for gifted programs in the district, and pointed to the elimination of "gifted funds" as having greatly impacted the academic success of talented students in East Aurora. The academy, they said, gives parents of children looking for a more rigorous workload a choice when choice is not an option.
Trends show that parents usually leave the district after the fifth and eighth grades. The academy keeps families who would otherwise leave in the district. Advocates said it is too early to compare grades of students who entered the academy to their previous marks, because the academy coursework is more rigorous.
Data show that there is already a significant difference in scores of magnet academy students when compared to other students based on Think Link assessments. Magnet Academy students scored higher in nearly every category.
ISAT scores proved the same. Magnet academy students' scores blew away those of all other district students -- with 100 percent of academy fifth- and eighth-grade students meeting or exceeding state requirements. Barely 70 percent of non-academy students could say the same.
"Nine months is not enough time to provide data to determine if program is or is not working," board member Juanita Wells said to audience applause.
"We as a board need to put aside personal agendas to work with administrators on behalf of our district, in order to make sound judgment and ask for support. We must be provided with information about success of program the program, and nine months is not enough time. It's going to take three to five years to gather sufficient data."
Rayanne Carlson gave an opposing opinion, and stated that students should be offered the same opportunity in all of the schools. She said the board must balance matters of the heart against budget matters, and the district simply cannot afford to keep the academy open.
"I believe in this program fiercely," Stella Gonzalez said. "I think we should coin a phrase. 'One year is not enough.' Research shows one year is not enough to see pros or cons of any program. ... I understand it is a lot of money, but I believe in enhancing, moving forward. This is my profession, kids are my love. We have just let things fall, and we have to give them a push. I hope we can keep you with the magnet schools."
"We have to be the people who make tough decisions and deal with consequences of those decisions," board president Dee Weaver said.
"The mission of the School Board is to educate students and provide them with the best education that you can get. If you get rid of this program, you're not doing that," Bob Coppenhoefer said.
"Parents should be informed of your intent to close the program and the reason for it. I heard all about intent, but haven't heard your reasons. Nobody seems to know why this is being done."
comment at beaconnewsonline.com