www.newstrib.com/articles/news/local/default.asp?article=144ADEFE41A9BDCEDE35FFC3764EBF1915657597342C4348(photo)
Teachers at Ottawa Township High School march the picket line along Main Street in Ottawa this morning after deciding to strike late Tuesday night. Teachers are negotiating with school board officials over salary and insurance.
Ottawa Township High School teacher Tracey O’Fallon had to stop to wipe away tears and compose herself before continuing to answer questions about why she went on strike.
“We know how we touch our students’ lives,” O’Fallon said. “We’ll be out here as long as it takes.”
More than 60 teachers including O’Fallon gathered at about 8 a.m. today to begin marching along Main Street in Ottawa in front of the high school as Day One of the OTHS teacher’s strike began.Ottawa Township High School Education Association union head Glenn Weatherford said the picket will go on during normal school hours, from about 7:45 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. each school day.
“Personally, to settle this, I would contribute (some of my paycheck to help pay insurance) but I have to think of my membership and what we want as a whole,” O’Fallon said.
The high school board and OTHS Education Association teacher’s union met for four hours Tuesday afternoon for a final chance to avoid this morning’s strike. Some issues were resolved, but no agreement was reached on the most contentious issue facing both sides: health insurance.
The 1,500-student district has 113 teachers making an average salary of $68,138. Teachers do not contribute for their insurance benefits, but the board is insisting upon a three-year contract that requires teachers to pay a portion of their own insurance per paycheck.
Picketers wore the school’s crimson and white and carried a variety of signs, some reading, “Rather Be Teaching,” “Quality Teachers = Quality Pay,” and “Support OTHSEA” as citizens drove by, some honking their car horns in support.
Most picketers refused to talk to members of the media. Some rudely declined while others more politely stated they were directed not to speak publicly and to defer all questions to union leaders.
Stacie Walton, UniServ director for Illinois Education Association — National Education Association (IEA-NEA) Region 15, said picketers were directed to avoid media contact so their message could be unified.
“We need a consistent message,” she said, “these people are fighting for their families and that’s the message.”
One of the picketers, Julie Mantzke, former president of the teacher’s union and a teacher of 14 years, said she was disappointed the board and union could not reach a settlement on Tuesday.
“Four years ago we settled a one-year contract with the intent that we would look closely at insurance,” she said. “The teachers formed an insurance committee and made recommendations but nothing was done.
“Now, they want us to pay a percentage of a fluctuating cost while they give the third-party administrator a raise,” she said. “We didn’t want it to come to this. We want to be in the classroom with our kids.”
Negotiation specifics
According to a press release made public by the board late Tuesday, the board offered a 1 percent salary increase on the base salary for each year of a two-or three-year contract, no insurance contribution from the teaching staff for single coverage, and an insurance contribution by the teachers for family coverage of $172 per month in Year 1, with a subsequent contribution not to exceed $215 per month, and $269 per month in Years 2 and 3, respectively.
The board also proposed including additional wellness benefits of $350 per family member covered by the health insurance plan.
Board chairman George “Skip” Hupp said the proposal was fair given the Illinois Valley’s current economic climate and the district’s financial health and teachers’ overall compensation and benefits.
“We explained our proposal to them, (and then) they caucused their people,” Hupp said. “When they came back they rejected the proposal, left no counter offer, and left.”
Weatherford said the insurance proposal wasn’t a set figure and could change annually based on who the board hires as a third-party administrator.
This, Weatherford said, was unacceptable.
“Basically, their proposal didn’t change and we couldn’t do anything to avoid a strike,” he said.
According to the district’s press release, the last formal proposal from the OTHSEA included no contribution for insurance and an increase of $1,600, $1,600, and $1,700 on the base for each of the three years of the contract, respectively. The first-year increase to the base would equate to a 4.67 percent base increase, a 7.3-percent average increase for the faculty as a whole, with a maximum increase of 10.2 percent.
“While the OTHSEA has indicated its willingness to modify this proposal they have not yet done so,” according to the board’s statement.
“Now we wait for them to accept our insurance proposal,” Hupp said. “They’ll have to ask us for another meeting.”